June 2, 2002
Now that the CPU was taken
care of, the next thing to tackle was the disk subsystem. The basic
configuration came with a 20 gig 7200 rpm hard disk which I decided to
replace with an older but still reliable 20 gig 7200 rpm HD. Yes,
this sounds stupid, but I had another system that could use the newer and
faster hard drive. The boot/application hard drive on the server
didn't need to be really fast, just reliable. Here are pictures of
the IBM hard drive I installed on the server.
-
Click image to enlarge
For the data drives, I decided
to go with two Maxtor D740X 80 gig hard drives in RAID 1 configuration.
I choose the Maxtor drives because they are fast, quiet, and have liquid
bearings. Not the cheapest 80 gig drives out there, but very good.
These drives are one of the few ATA133 drives out there. Not that
you'll see any real difference between ATA133 or ATA100. But what
about ATA133 versus ATA66? Also, since the 500SC has 64 bit 66 Mhz
PCI slots, would there be a difference between that and a standard 32 bit
33 MHz, PCI bus?
The reason I ask this question
is because I had an older Fasttrack 66 laying around which uses a 32 bit
33 Mhz PCI slot. I installed this card with the Maxtor drives and
did some benchmarks to see how this card performed.
Here is the Fasttrack 66
card in a regular 32 bit 33 Mhz PCI slot.
-
Click image to enlarge
In the meantime, I did some
research and looked for a RAID card that could support ATA133 and work
in a 64 bit 66 Mhz PCI slot. I found that the Promise
TX2000 card did exactly this. Promise
Technologies was kind enough to send us a TX2000 to use in our server
and compare with the Fasttrack 66.
-
-
Click image to enlarge
Here are the two Maxtor 80
gig 7200 rpm drives. Time to stuff the drives and cables into the
case.
-
Click image to enlarge
The two drives will reside
behind these two 3.5 inch bay covers. In order to do this, we need
to take the whole drive bay assembly out.
Click image to enlarge
Unscrew this little screw
and then slide out the bay.
-
-
Click image to enlarge
I'll put the drives in from
the backside.
Click image to enlarge
One drive in.
-
Click image to enlarge
Two drives in.
-
Click image to enlarge
There we go, everything is
tucked in nice and tight!
Click image to enlarge
Now with both cards in hand,
I did some testing to compare the Fasttrack 66 against the TX2000 on a
regular 32 bit 33 Mhz slot and also in 64 bit 66 Mhz slot. Here are
the results, again using Sandra Sisoft. I know some of you are going
to complain that I didn't use some other hard drive benchmarking software,
but since this isn't a full on review of hardware, I was happy to just
get a rough idea of how the hardware performed.
I first compared the Fasttrack66
against the TX2000 in a 32 bit 33 Mhz PCI slot.
|
Sandra Sisoft
|
32 bit 33 Mhz PCI slot
- Drive Index
|
|
Fasttrack 66
|
25279
|
|
TX2000
|
26340
|
Okay, so using the same hard
drives and the same 32 bit 33 Mhz PCI slot, the TX2000 is slightly faster
than the Fasttrack 66. However, the difference is not all that large.
Once I got that test out
of the way, I was interested in testing the TX2000 in a 32 bit 33 Mhz PCI
slot versus a 64 bit 66 Mhz PCI slot. Here are the results.
|
Sandra Sisoft
|
32 bit 33 Mhz PCI slot
|
64 bit 66 Mhz PCI slot
|
|
TX2000
|
26340
|
26238
|
Whoa! The scores for the
64 bit slot are lower than those for the 32 bit slot. Why is this?
I have no idea. I repeated the tests just to make sure and the 32
bit slot was still faster. Then again, this is just one benchmark.
In different benchmarks, the results may be different. Nonetheless,
I left the TX2000 in the 64 bit 66 Mhz PCI slot.
|